Yamaha R3 Forums banner

My R3 Review

1 reading
22K views 17 replies 9 participants last post by  KevinW 2017R3  
Awesome review. I think there are quite a few people, me included, who bought the R3 after riding other bikes for many years, rather than as a first motorcycle. As your review also suggests, it really tends to check some important boxes. I got my new 2019 for $4,900 OTD, and I have been averaging 55 mpg -- including plenty of spirited hooliganism and 85 mph highway cruising mixed with "normal" commuting. It's also, as you say, "fast enough to be fun", even though it's darn sure no liter bike; 100 mph is quite easily achievable, and too much more than that is really asking for jail time, anyway. That's actually part of why I chose this bike in particular: it kind of helps you control yourself because, even though it has what it NEEDS power-wise, it WON'T EVER do 150+ LOL, and unlike a 1,000, you can routinely wind it out to 12,000 RPM -- even around town if you want -- without worrying about getting arrested. I couldn't agree more about the phenomenal nature of the powerplant and fueling -- what gems they are! I for one really love the high-RPM power delivery characteristics. It's still got enough torque to putter around town just fine at 4,000 RPM, if you're in no hurry. Anyway, I don't mean to write another review here or anything, I just find myself agreeing with a lot of what you've said about this model. Nicely done.

Also, I'm actually not a big fan of the Ninja 400, either. I just think the R3 is better in every way except outright power: fit and finish, clutch, chassis/ergos, looks, character/cool factor.

Note on shifting the R3 (something I really wish I had known before ever riding it): I discovered that the best way to avoid those annoying missed shifts from 1 to 2 is to make sure that your toe stays pressed all the way inward toward the center of the bike while you shift. I found that the issue was actually my toe slipping partly or completely up and to the left. After making that adjustment several weeks ago, I don't think I've missed even one shift. I just hope I haven't damaged anything by missing them and revving to 12,500 in neutral more times than I'd care to admit...sigh. Anyway, we live, and we learn.
 
The seat on the Ninja felt like it leaned forward into the tank, while the bars were a little too low. The big difference was that the bike felt less refined. The 400 makes more power, but not a huge amount, so wasn't relevant for me. It all comes down to personal preference between them. To me, both are more fun fir street use than the RC390, the R3 feels more flickable, the Ninja more drag race worthy. The R3 nicest aesthetically off the floor (Ninja okay, RC the least attractive.) The RC would likely be better on track stock, and the Ninja for two up riding. The R3 seems more suited to commuting and mixed environments. The R3 also has more available aftermarket bits and race prep stuff for those so inclined. I just found, that when all the boxes were ticked, I came back to the R3.
I don't really have anything nice to say about the RC (even though, yes, it will perform well on track...for a little while, anyway...) haha.

I have done a little two-up riding locally and found that results were a bit mixed. Passenger was ~125 pounds. It would still do 100 mph and easily pass big-rigs on flats (albeit needing 9-11k that much more), and it still seemed to pull hills okay for the most part, but I was definitely getting the impression that it would sometimes struggle to maintain high speeds on steeper hills. I found that I needed to always be a gear lower than normal in order to achieve the same results -- rendering my sixth gear utterly useless for two-up (my bike is geared to 16/42 -- MUCH taller than stock; a stock bike would still occasionally need fifth gear, especially with a heavier passenger). It will certainly get you both places absolutely fine if you're okay needing to slow down to 65 here or there, but you WILL need to do that sometimes when riding two-up. I don't think there would ever be any issues maintaining 65 even with a heavier passenger (much heavier is going to exceed its technical weight capacity, anyway).